Even though I have toyed with the idea of a website and a newsletter dedicated to social service research in Singapore – aligned to my professional interests as an aspiring social welfare researcher – it was an exchange on the forum pages of “The Straits Times” in May 2019 which provided the final push.
Relying solely on the news report and without reading the actual report of the findings (conducted by the Centre for Ageing Research Education located at the Duke-NUS Medical School), I concluded erroneously – based on a line in the news report that “29.5 per cent of adults aged 60 and above reported that they thought they had adequate income to meet their monthly household expenses, while still having some money left over” – that 70.5 per cent of these adults therefore had inadequate income.
- 29.5%: Enough money, with some left over;
- 49.3%: Just enough money, no difficulty;
- 14.6%: Some difficulty to meet expenses; and
- 3.8%: Much difficulty to meet expenses.
In addition to my personal arrogance and carelessness, there are broader motivations too. In Singapore and around the world, the average reader – including social service practitioners – may find it difficult to understand academic journal articles, books, and publications, while newspaper articles referencing research or data may not offer greater clarity. And even if the findings are well-understood, what are the implications for practitioners, and how might they apply the knowledge to other professional settings?
Of concern here is the last-mile translation from research to practice, aligned with a common concern over the conduct of social service research (in Singapore), where non-profit organisations participate in studies by recruiting research participants, researchers publish findings, but no one checks if the lives of the beneficiaries have changed. In this vein, a small step forward is to help and empower practitioners and beneficiaries – who should not be bystanders to the research process – with even more knowledge and better data literacy.
With that in mind, there are three sections to socialservice.sg:
“So what?”Reading journal articles and books about Singapore, paying special attention to academic and practical significance.
“What it might have been”Reviewing publications or reports by the government, a think-tank, or a non-profit as well as newspaper articles referencing research or data.
“What’s going on?”Summarising the most important news stories around the world and in Singapore (bi-monthly).
Subscribe to the monthly socialservice.sg newsletter
A complement to socialservice.sg: A monthly newsletter on social service research in Singapore for researchers, practitioners, and the general public. Three sections each newsletter: “So what?” (the academic and practical significance of journal articles and books); “What it might have been” (publications and newspaper articles on research or data); and “What’s going on?” (summaries of the most important news stories around the world).
Other publications and features
Young S’poreans need to keep asking hard questions on how the govt shapes policies (Mothership, July 5, 2020)
Telling stories of the marginalised in an ethical manner (The Straits Times, August 13, 2020)
Donations hit record $2.9 billion in 2018, but charities expect collections to fall this year due to pandemic (The Straits Times, October 23, 2020)
Long, harsh winter for S’porean students in US and Europe as Covid-19 cases spike (The Straits Times, November 1, 2020)
A growing government-ground divide: Youth civic and political engagement in a post-pandemic, post-GE2020 Singapore (Singapore Policy Journal, November 14, 2020)
Study on divorce’s impact on kids did not examine cause, says MSF (The Straits Times, December 13, 2020)
Army of unsung heroes ensured pleasant flight home, stay-home notice period (TODAY, December 14, 2020)